Phone isn't as fast, but it's still usable and wouldn't shut down anymore. They weren't doing this on phones with good batteries to imply planned obsolescence and if you replaced battery, you restored full performance. BENCHMARKS DELETED GEEKBENCH OVER ALLEGATIONS FULL Problem was they didn't notify users about it or give them choice and that's where "battery gate" came from, not all the stuff people make up here.Īnd only reason there was lawsuit and they paid it because it's a big American company. Good luck just filing a class lawsuit with Chinese company lmao. The situation with OnePlus's "cheating" is exactly the same thing. They're being scrutinized because they didn't communicate the thing to users and they just made it a transparent function that does the job without any user knowledge or interaction. I mean, what they have to gain if they slowdown daily apps and not benchmarks? When you cheat you kinda don't restrict daily apps and you artificially boost benchmarks to score better than the rest. So, this alone makes no sense to be called "cheating". Cheating was when Realme (was it GT Neo?) was caught degrading output image in benchmarks into some mangled mess to artificially boost performance. That was specifically targeting benchmarks to cheat. This here is just running benchmarks unrestricted and it's restricting social media garbage as evident from the list of optimized apps. It's literally optimization.Įxcept for some software glitches off late, Oxygen OS was well optimized Android skins just after stock Android bare skin which is present on Pixel Line up. BENCHMARKS DELETED GEEKBENCH OVER ALLEGATIONS SKIN I am excited to test Pixel 6/Pixel 6 Pro with snapdragon 870ish performance of battery life and CPU. I hope this is landmark in Google/Pixel line up with respect to camera and in house chipset for better control over software. Oxygen OS was well managed till One Plus 6T/7T. Its just that they ruined everything with price and software updates after Oxygen OS 10.3.4. I hope ZTE competes with them soon by producing quality products. One Plus 3T to One Plus 7T was One Plus peak era. ![]() BENCHMARKS DELETED GEEKBENCH OVER ALLEGATIONS SOFTWAREīut now Samsung has upped the game in software experience and Oppo/Vivo/Xiaomi has upped their game in camera department. I hope they focus on Oxygen OS more than releasing singke product per year at affordable price points. One Plus doesn't deserve a single penny above 600USD.ĪnonD-1003038, But is it really cheating? What's the point in giving. moreIt would've been easily excusable if they have only limited the performance on SNS apps or very lightweight apps that will never need the extra performance from the X1 core. ![]() Unfortunately, however, they do this on wide variety of apps including a few browsers as well as fairly CPU intensive MS/Google office, along with several of their own system apps.Īccording to Anandtech: "having it side-by-side to a Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, or a Xiaomi Mi11 (Ultra) and paying attention, I do very much notice that the OnePlus 9 Pro is less responsive", even though they do indeed admit that they "cannot quantify it properly".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |